Back

Understanding zkSync: How Zero-Knowledge Rollups Scale Ethereum

zksync explained

Blockchain scalability has been a significant challenge since the technology’s inception. As decentralized networks like Ethereum grow in usage, the cost and time required to process transactions increase. Solutions to this issue are critical for the wider adoption of blockchain technologies. One of the most promising innovations to address this problem is zkSync, a Layer 2 (L2) scaling solution for Ethereum. zkSync relies on zero-knowledge rollup (ZK-rollup) technology to improve transaction speed, reduce costs, and maintain Ethereum’s security.

In this article, we will discuss zkSync, including how it works, its key components, how it compares to optimistic rollups, and its benefits for developers and users. Additionally, we will explore the role of the zkEVM in the zkSync ecosystem.

Sign up on BITFLEX today via our link and trade Bitcoin hassle-free. Seize this exclusive opportunity and redeem up to $68,888 in rewards. Act now and claim your reward!

The Need for zkSync: Blockchain Scalability

Scalability in blockchain refers to the network’s ability to handle a growing number of transactions without slowing down or becoming too expensive. As transaction volume increases, blockchain networks like Ethereum experience congestion, leading to higher fees and slower processing times.

Traditional Layer 1 solutions are limited by the structure of blockchain itself, where every transaction must be validated by all network nodes, creating a bottleneck. To address this, Layer 2 solutions like zkSync were developed, allowing transactions to be processed off-chain before final settlement on the main Ethereum network.

Key Takeaways

  • zkSync uses zero-knowledge rollups to scale Ethereum, offering faster and cheaper transactions without compromising security.
  • zkSync Era’s zkEVM enables developers to write smart contracts in Solidity, ensuring seamless compatibility with Ethereum.
  • Unlike optimistic rollups, zkSync provides immediate transaction finality, eliminating the need for a challenge period.
  • zkSync offers enhanced privacy and efficiency, making it a key solution for Ethereum scalability and decentralized application development.

What Is zkSync?

zkSync is a Layer 2 scaling solution designed to address Ethereum’s scalability issues. Developed by Matter Labs, zkSync employs ZK-rollup technology, a method that bundles multiple transactions into a single proof and then verifies them on Ethereum’s mainnet. This approach reduces both the time and cost associated with individual transactions while ensuring the network’s security and integrity.

History of zkSync

zkSync launched its initial platform, zkSync 1.0, in June 2020. This version allowed for fast and cheap transactions but lacked support for smart contracts. To overcome this limitation, Matter Labs introduced zkSync 2.0, later rebranded as zkSync Era, in late 2022. zkSync Era added support for smart contracts and aimed to create an EVM-compatible solution, allowing Ethereum developers to build decentralized applications (DApps) with ease.

Zero-Knowledge Rollups

What Are Zero-Knowledge Rollups?

A zero-knowledge rollup (ZK-rollup) is a scalability solution that processes multiple off-chain transactions and generates a cryptographic proof (zero-knowledge proof) to confirm their validity. The Ethereum network only needs to verify this proof, making transaction processing much faster and less expensive.

ZK-rollups rely on three main components:

  • Smart Contracts: Manage interactions between Layer 1 and Layer 2.
  • Provers: Generate cryptographic proofs of transaction validity.
  • Verifiers: Validate the proofs and submit them to the Ethereum mainnet.

The term “zero-knowledge” refers to the fact that the prover can convince the verifier of the transaction’s validity without revealing the specific details of the transaction. This preserves privacy while maintaining trust.

Optimistic Rollups

Optimistic rollups assume that all transactions are valid and rely on network participants to dispute any incorrect transactions. These systems have a challenge period—usually around seven days—during which users can contest invalid transactions. This delay makes optimistic rollups slower than ZK-rollups.

In contrast, zkSync finalizes transactions as soon as the zero-knowledge proof is verified, eliminating the need for a challenge period. This leads to faster settlement times and greater efficiency compared to optimistic rollups.

How zkSync Works

zkSync relies on ZK-rollup technology to batch transactions into bundles, which are then verified on Ethereum’s Layer 1. The Ethereum network only has to validate the zero-knowledge proof (ZKP) for the entire batch, rather than each individual transaction. This reduces the computational load on Ethereum and lowers gas fees for users.

One of zkSync’s key innovations is its use of ZK-SNARK technology for proof generation. ZK-SNARK (Succinct Non-Interactive Argument of Knowledge) is a cryptographic method that allows for more efficient proof generation than its counterpart, ZK-STARK (Scalable Transparent Argument of Knowledge). ZK-SNARKs are cheaper and more familiar to developers, making them the preferred option for zkSync.

Join BITFLEX using our link to trade Bitcoin and Ethereum right away. Take advantage of our exclusive offer and stand a chance to win up to $68,888 in rewards. Don't miss out!

zkEVM: EVM Compatibility with Zero-Knowledge Proofs

One of the significant challenges with early ZK-rollup solutions was their incompatibility with Ethereum’s Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). Traditional ZK-based smart contracts used specialized languages, which were not compatible with Ethereum’s programming language, Solidity. This forced developers to choose between building applications on Ethereum or zkSync, limiting adoption.

To address this, Matter Labs developed zkEVM, a virtual machine that supports zero-knowledge proof computation while maintaining compatibility with the Ethereum network. zkEVM allows developers to write smart contracts in familiar languages like Solidity, making it easier for them to migrate DApps from Ethereum to zkSync. This breakthrough is considered a major milestone in scaling Ethereum, as it bridges the gap between Layer 1 and Layer 2 technologies.

zkEVM in Action

With zkEVM, developers can create smart contracts that leverage zero-knowledge technology without having to learn new programming languages. This makes zkSync a more attractive option for Ethereum developers who want to build faster and more cost-efficient applications while maintaining the security of the Ethereum network.

zkSync Era: Features and Benefits

Native Account Abstraction

zkSync offers native account abstraction, allowing users to manage their wallets as smart contracts. This feature enables a wide range of possibilities, such as eliminating seed phrases, combining multiple transactions, and automating payments. It simplifies user experience while maintaining flexibility.

Enhanced Privacy and Security

zkSync’s ZK-rollup technology offers native privacy protection by validating transactions without revealing sensitive information. This privacy advantage is especially important for applications requiring confidentiality, such as financial services.

Additionally, zkSync inherits Ethereum’s security, as the ZK-rollups are anchored to Ethereum’s base layer, ensuring robust protection against network attacks.

Faster and Cheaper Transactions

By bundling transactions and verifying them off-chain, zkSync significantly reduces gas fees. Additionally, ZK-rollups finalize transactions almost instantly, making zkSync much faster than Ethereum’s Layer 1.

EVM Compatibility

The main advantage of zkSync Era is its EVM compatibility. With zkEVM, developers can build smart contracts in Solidity, ensuring a smooth transition from Ethereum to zkSync. This allows for greater interoperability between Layer 1 and Layer 2.

zkSync vs. Optimistic Rollups: A Detailed Comparison

While both zkSync and optimistic rollups aim to scale Ethereum, they differ in several key aspects.

  • Transaction Finality: zkSync offers immediate finality after proof validation, while optimistic rollups have a challenge period, leading to slower finality.
  • Security Model: zkSync uses zero-knowledge proofs to ensure transaction validity, providing a higher degree of trust. Optimistic rollups rely on external participants to flag incorrect transactions.
  • Gas Efficiency: zkSync’s proof system is more gas-efficient, resulting in lower transaction fees. Optimistic rollups, in comparison, consume more gas due to their reliance on challenge periods.
  • Privacy: zkSync inherently provides privacy due to zero-knowledge proofs, while optimistic rollups do not offer the same level of confidentiality.

Conclusion

zkSync represents a significant advancement in Ethereum scalability. By leveraging zero-knowledge proofs and ZK-rollup technology, zkSync offers faster, cheaper, and more secure transactions without sacrificing the security of the Ethereum network. With the development of zkEVM, zkSync enables developers to easily migrate their Ethereum DApps to a Layer 2 solution, providing a seamless and efficient user experience.

zkSync’s compatibility with Ethereum’s EVM, combined with its privacy features and account abstraction, makes it a promising solution for the future of blockchain scalability. As blockchain adoption continues to grow, zkSync’s technology could play a key role in making decentralized applications more accessible and efficient.

Maximize your Bitcoin trading potential with BITFLEX! Register through our link and redeem rewards of up to $68,888. Don’t let this exclusive offer slip away – claim your reward now!

DISCLAIMER: All content on CryptoKid.com is provided for informational purposes and is not an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any product, service, or investment. The opinions expressed on CryptoKid.com do not constitute investment advice, and independent financial advice should be sought where appropriate. Trading is a highly risky activity that can lead to major losses; therefore, please consult your financial advisor before making any decision. CryptoKid.com will not be held liable for any of your personal trading or investing decisions. CryptoKid.com will not be held liable for any losses you may incur by speculating in the market.

Please view the full disclaimer at: CryptoKid.com/disclaimer

Founder of CryptoKid.com, 17 y/o Technical Analyst & Angel Investor